Covid-19 Series, Entry #10

Of facts and opinions, lies and truth.

The other day I “engaged” in a social media “conversation” because apparently I still think that I can save the world from a global pandemic….and maybe more importantly, ignorance.

I stumbled upon a post about how Covid isn’t really all that bad, blah blah blah. And then I did what a woman, suffering from chronic rage, with a well stocked whiskey cabinet, should NEVER DO…read the comments.

First comment: “Last I heard the CDC also said there is no scientific evidence that the mask even help one way or another.”

Followed by: “compared to the flu, I think the death rates are comparable.”

Then I chimed in: “So, from 2018-2019 influenza killed just over 34,000 people. Covid has killed 180,000 since March, so numbers aren’t comparable. Also, there has been a ton of evidence that masks are helpful in reducing the spread. When the mask mandate took effect in JoCo, numbers dropped dramatically compared to other counties in KS where the mandate wasn’t upheld. 🙂

(Note my little smiley emoji…for good measure)

Then she said: “You’re entitled to your own opinion…”

So this got me thinking…have we forgotten the difference between facts and opinions? Because if we have then I have absolutely no hope that we, as a society, will ever be more than ranting and raving lunatics who will devolve into some sort of unrecognizable species over the next several generations. Has anyone seen Wayward Pines? What once seemed a far fetched (yet entertaining) plot now seems frighteningly possible.

To avoid plummeting into a world of chaos, driven by misinformation and untruths (or I guess….falling further into it?), let’s go back and revisit what we should have learned in elementary school. We’ll start with some definitions.

Fact: A thing that is known or proven to be true.

2+2 = 4 is an example of a fact. As many times as I attempt to disprove this, I cannot. 2+2 will always equal 4.

Truth: In accordance with fact or reality.

I am currently watching reruns of The Office is an example of a true statement.

Opinion: A view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

Coffee should always be served hot is an example of an opinion. I get all sorts of irritated when I go through the Starbucks drive thru and they ask if I want my latte hot or cold. THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO SERVE COFFEE!!! But alas, this is my opinion. Not based on any facts, simply my own preferences.

Lie: An intentionally false statement

I love iced coffee is a bold faced, dirty lie.

I shouldn’t need to tell anyone that social media, and often times the actual media, has a propensity for untruths, opinions disguised as facts, flat out lies and other misleading information. And now it is more important than ever to put on our collective thinking caps, sort through the crap, discern fact from fiction and enable ourselves to make wise, informed decisions.

Cool…so how do I do that?

Here are some questions that I ask myself when I’m evaluating a piece of information:

  1. Is this source reliable? Sources like the Associated Press and Reuters are generally accepted as more reliable because of their objectivity and higher standard of information gathering. Sources like Breitbart and Occupy Democrats are poor sources of objective information as they have a tendency to be quite sensational and largely composed of opinions and partial truths spun by very extreme thinkers to support particular causes. I’m not going to judge you for reading them, but you really need to have your spidey senses turned way up and question/research (using unbiased sources) pretty much everything before you accept it as fact. This might be a helpful graphic. The same can be said for medical journals. Some are renowned for their quality (JAMA, NEJM, CHEST, etc.), while others…well…aren’t actual medical journals. The Bestest Journal from the Doctors of Alternative Aromatherapy is probably not my first choice for high quality studies and up to date recommendations.
  2. Is this an opinion piece or an actual news article? If something you are reading says “Editorial” or “Op-Ed” this is an opinion piece. In a perfect world an editorial or an op-ed should incorporate facts to support the opinions stated, but the piece as a whole, should not be taken for fact.
  3. Is this a meme? If you are getting your information from memes, please stop. Anyone can put together a legit looking meme that is composed of blatant lies.
We’ve already established that I loathe cold coffee. Also…I literally drink coffee always. But if you didn’t already know this about me, you might believe my little picture featuring catchy font and my hip, off the shoulder sweater and tell all of your friends that I like cold coffee.

4. Is this hearsay? If someone starts a sentence with “Well, I heard…” Stop them right there and ask, “Where did you hear that? Who said it? What is the source?” If there is no reliable source, or if it was found “on the internet” this information is likely not reliable…it is either an opinion or a lie…or maybe a partial truth. Regardless, it is important that you identify it for what it is before you consider believing it. Take for example my interaction described above. If I didn’t question that this person, we’ll call her Donna (you’re welcome, Karens of the world), knew what she was talking about, I might believe that the CDC actually said that masks aren’t helpful in slowing the spread of Covid. And then I would lament buying those cute masks on Etsy. But I fancy myself a critical thinker, so that’s not what happened. I generally feel like I’m up to date on most Covid information, but I went ahead and did my own research to investigate Donna’s statement. This little gem was posted two days ago verifying that the CDC recommends wearing masks because they do help stop the spread of Covid-19. Boom….TRUTH BOMB!

5. Is this founded in any sort of reality? If someone starts a statement with “I think….” well fabulous….good to know that you are thinking! But just because someone is “thinking” something, does not validate it as truthful or reliable information, or something you should use to support your decision to not wear a mask or take something seriously. Again, to reference my conversation with Donna, it would be amazing if Covid were similar to influenza in its morbidity and mortality. I can see how this line of thinking is very attractive to everyone who is tired of this pandemic…which is literally everyone in the world. But because we want it to be true, or because Donna on Facebook said she thinks it’s true does not mean that it is true. So let’s go back to some independent research. If you do a quick Google search for “CDC influenza mortality” it will lead you here. Scroll down and you can see mortality data from influenza for the past several years. Then you can go here and find the current mortality data from Covid-19. Then you can draw your own opinion about the death rates of influenza and Covid-19 and if they are…comparable. And if after looking at this data, you still think that they are comparable…then our next lesson will clearly need to be on elementary math…

6. Does it sound too terrifying to be true?

Nevermind….odds are good that it’s true. #2020

I hope this little exercise gave us all some tools for interpreting information and empowered us to use a higher standard when disseminating information.

Keep wearing your masks, keep your distance from others and be nice to people actually named Karen.

13 thoughts on “Covid-19 Series, Entry #10

  1. Thank you. Months ago, I actually watched the “Plandemic” video because many of my IRL friends were posting panicked pleas on social media. I have done a lot of social media hygiene since then and it is contributing to my improved mental health. Thank you for your service.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Masks are a interesting argument, was the mask the cause of the reduction in Johnson County? Or was it social distance?
    Or maybe, just maybe it was the handwashing? Hand washing and sanitizer was available everywhere. So was it the masks? Or hand washing? The cause of the decreased spread. In the medical field the No.1 combating the spread of a pathogen is hand washing. When did it change to masks? When putting on a mask is like using screen door as a umbrella.


    1. John, you are correct that correlation does not equal causation. I think it would be hard to make a case that at the same time the mask mandate went into effect, the population of JoCo also decided to become aggressive hand washers…though that would be lovely. The mask mandate was the most significant variable that changed which makes a strong case for the effectiveness of masks. We have seen this repeated in other populations as well. Also, the type of mask worn certainly does impact its efficacy. If you are wearing one of those thin Gator things, it probably is like a screen door…or possibly even worse. But if you are wearing an N95, you’re pretty close to an umbrella. I would encourage you to look up data and studies regarding masks and their efficacy specifically regarding Covid-19. A lot of people find data about masks and the flu and extrapolate this to coronavirus which is not appropriate.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. I would conclude that masks became #1 for prevention with this disease when the CDC identified it as being spread primarily by respiratory droplets. (At first I said “I think…” but I learned something from Dr. Pear & changed it.)


  3. I have finally found a kindred spirit. Coffee was meant to be hot. Even in the summer when it’s hotter than Hades, I will still drink my cup of joe as hot as possible.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. So so soooo good! Not only do I feel your pain, I am grateful for advice on how to respond. (And the resources attached.) Pleeeease keep it up!


  5. I teach 9th grade science – this was literally today’s lesson! Peer review, substantiated information vs. un. I was feeling it a moral duty to hammer the kids with this. I wanted to make explaining it to the adults in their lives homework but decided maybe that was a bit much

    Liked by 1 person

  6. On your number 1 entry I exclude all news sources because they all pander to their bases. I do my own research because generally the source information is available. I started to say “readily available” but quickly realized that wasn’t true. It does take effort. Masks do protect the wearer. That is contrary to popular opinion and make no mistake, that is my opinion. I question the CDC, the Surgeon General and Dr. Fauci, as well as a host of others that did not refute their statements regarding masks not helping early on. I am paraphrasing of course. If I can’t get there logically then I am probably not going there. If I can I am probably willing to argue the point.


  7. Thank you for your voice of reason in what seems to be an increasing number of people I thought were sane jumping on the fake information regarding COVID bus. I too have tried engaging them in conversation on their posts to try to educate with actual facts and way they avoid direct questions and just keep spouting the same propaganda with more links to YouTube videos (because those have to be accurate, right?) is very frustrating. They’ve also decided that if a post or video is blocked because it was fact checked in fact means that this is actually true and there is a big conspiracy out there trying to take away our freedom by making us wear masks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s